Tag Archive: Democrcy

2013
03/28

Category:
David's Musings

TAG:





COMMENTS:
Comments Closed

Hopefully the last word*

on the Miliband saga goes to Sadie Smith, writing in Total Politics:

“My name is Miliband. Commander of the Armies of the North. General of new Labour. Loyal servant to the true Emperor, St Tony of Blair. Brother to a treacherous sibling, righteous heir to a political dynasty – and I will have my vengeance, in this life or the next.”

* Or is it?

2013
03/19

Category:
David's Musings

TAG:



COMMENTS:
Comments Closed

Cyprus Cartoon

After Greece (May 2010) Ireland (November 2010) and Portugal (May 2011), Cyprus has become the fourth country to receive European Union and International Monetary Fund aid. The €10bn of aid is less than initially discussed and comes with conditions. However, unlike previous bailout terms, which have called for budget cuts and privatisations, now the EU and IMF want a tax on bank deposits. Spain, meanwhile, completed a deal to recapitalise its banks in December 2012, without signing any binding memorandum with the troika European Commission-ECB-IMF.

vonk-eurovision

Berend Vonk (b. 1962) is a Dutch cartoonist, illustrator, graphic designer and painter. He works for TrouwHet Financieele DagbladVrij Nederland and Het Parool, among others. In 1993, he won the Ilse Frankenthal prize for young graphic designers and in 2009, the Stripschap, the Netherlands’ only prize for cartoonists.

Ack: Presseurop

Hardly what one might call ‘Express’ news – what?

In an article dated today and headlined: “A BOMBSHELL ANSWER ON TRADE WITH THE EU” we are informed by Patrick O’Flynn of the Daily Express that there has been a crucial breakthrough in the battle to demonstrate that Britain would not be left at a trading disadvantage were it to leave the European Union; adding that Lord Stoddart of Swindon, a long-time opponent of the EU, has just hit the jackpot with a ministerial answer on the matter.

Actually, I hardly think that the use of the word ‘just’ is correct in view of the fact that this piece of news is 8 days old.

Just saying………

So why is Cameron not ‘whipless’?

What is the difference between an MP who is not present in Parliament and thus cannot represent his/her constituents; and an MP who is present in Parliament but is unable to represent his/her constituents?

The question is asked as Cameron was queried on ITV’s “This Morning” about the speed with which Nadine Dorries was deprived of the Conservative Whip for her decision to appear on “I’m a celeb etc, etc” when compared with the action that was taken with Andrew Mitchell and the offense of swearing at a police officer.

In the context of the question it is necessary to repeat a question that I have posed, as one of his constituents, to David Cameron; namely how can he, as my Member of Parliament, represent me against what I consider an injustice as a result of government policy when he is the Government and who actually decides government policy? This question should be put by every constituent whose Member of Parliament accepts ministerial or PPS office.

Another aspect of this interview on “this Morning” is that it becomes obvious that if a politician appears on a ‘patsy’ programme then he will only receive ‘patsy’ questions. While it is accepted that Schofield is working ‘under direction’, if he wishes to be taken seriously as an interviewer then should he not have pressed Cameron on what is a matter of the lack of ‘separation of power’ between the Executive and those that are meant to hold the government to account? This ‘interview’ also further repeats an earlier question I have raised; namely when considering the political class and the media – in whose pocket is who?

Needless to say, I am unable to let this matter of the lack of separation of power pass without pointing out that it is the reason for Demand #3 of the Harrogate Agenda.

Call that a ‘Waugh’ Room?

Paul Waugh, in a post in what he calls his Waugh Room, on Politics Home, attempts to pour scorn on David Heath, Defra Minister for intimating the Queen herself had told Parliament that her Government would introduce draft legislation for a ban on circus animals.

As Richard North, EU Referendum, points out – in which he very kindly links to an article from me on this subject – there is an ‘elephant in the room’. Consequently it matters not whether the Queen did, or did not, say her Government would introduce draft legislation for a ban on circus animals.

There really is not much point in having a ‘Waugh Room’ if, on the ‘plot’, you have a major combatant missing or, even worse, lose the plot.

Just saying…………

Afterthought:  As Richard North notes today: “But, since the legacy media, in all its arrogance, believes news to be only that which it deems necessary to tell us, that is no great loss. As always, we have to look beyond the headlines to find out what is really going on.”

Then democracy we do not have

I hold no ‘brief’ for either the English Defense League nor the British Freedom Party but when such a situation as this can happen, then democracy we do not have.

Today, I was informed by my Local Authority that Council Tax is “an enforced contribution where failure to pay is punishable by law”. Where what is a voluntary act can be enforced, then democracy we do not have.

All the more reason then for adoption of the Harrogate Agenda.

Just saying……..

 

 

2012
10/17

Category:
David's Musings

TAG:




COMMENTS:
Comments Closed

Baumgartner (times 2)

On 15 October, British Prime Minister David Cameron (right) and the Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond (left) signed the Edinburgh Agreement, by which Westminster authorises Scotland to hold a referendum on independence in autumn 2014. Cameron must now face the most conservative fringe of his party, which is calling for a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU.

Peter Brookes (b. 1943) is an English cartoonist who has produced work for numerous publications, including the New Statesman, The Spectator and most notably The Times, for which he is the leader-page cartoonist.

Ack Presseurop.

2012
10/14

Category:
David's Musings

TAG:



COMMENTS:
Comments Closed

Back to school Gove – and take your Mail friend with you

In today’s Mail on Sunday we are informed that the chances of Britain leaving the European Union rose dramatically with the news that Michael Gove believes it is time to tell Brussels bluntly: ‘We are ready to quit’. Apparently Gove is of the opinion that it is about time it was spelt out, in simple words that even Brussels bureaucrats can understand, that the existing situation is no longer tolerable; that if some of the important powers that they snaffled from us are not returned, that we will leave.

We all know that politicians are a tad lacking where the ‘little grey cells’ are concerned so the news that some Tory ministers are shocked to discover the extent of Brussels’ power to interfere in UK legislation comes as no surprise. If Gove really does believe that which Simon Walters writes then he is indeed worthy of the contempt that crass ignorance deserves. Unfortunately Gove is not the only one exhibiting crass ignorance as he is joined by ‘Grandee’ Bernard Jenkin who also believes that it is possible to renegotiate the unnegotiable.

Then of course we have the situation in which a so-called journalist, writing for a so-called newspaper, publishes what they both presumably consider to be facts but which are without doubt fiction – which is usually the result when idiots write about idiots. And a misleading idiot Walters shows himself to be with the statement that Cameron will formally announce later this month the first major step towards grabbing back powers from Brussels, setting out in detail how he plans to withdraw Britain from EU justice ties. This “major step” is no more than exercising an opt-out on 130 EU directives and regulations covering crime, justice and policing – including the controversial European arrest warrant. Walters then cannot bring himself to comment on the travesty, where democracy is concerned, that will be Cameron deciding which to ‘cherry-pick’ for opting back into without any input from those his decision will affect.

On affairs EU there are many words being both written and said about what a sad event will be the divorce. Those so lamenting should remember that the divorce is the second saddest event of this entire affair – the first was the marriage.

The man from Number 10, he say ‘No’

Earlier today Conservative Home proudly trumpeted that nearly 100 Conservative MPs had signed a letter to David Cameron  urging him “to place on the Statute Book before the next General Election a commitment to hold a referendum during the next Parliament on the nature of our relationship with the European Union”. 

I have refrained from posting on ‘matters Europe’, even superficially, as Richard North has been doing such an excellent job over at EUReferendum in a ‘string of posts’ (on top of which he knows a damn sight more about it than I do), however I cannot allow this domestic event on ’matters Europe’ to pass uncommented.

From Politics Home we learn that 100 Conservative MPs have now signed this letter – not only that but Cameron, attending what we are informed is an EU Summit (it isn’t; it is a meeting of the European Council – but hey, why let a matter of detail interfere with such an inferior example of journalistic expertise) dismisses calls for a referendum on our country’s membership of the EU (and, figuratively speaking, the ink on the letter is not even dry yet). This series of events demonstrates the benefits we have of living under an elected dictatorship – but I digress.

Just what is it that Cameron does not understand about this statement from José Manuel Barroso:

“ ………..I do not want to talk about a specific country, but it’s like a club, if a member fails to comply with the rules it is better for him to leave the club and this applies to any organization, any institution, for any project. ” 

Just what is it that Cameron does not understand about the fact that there is not one article in the Treaty on European Union (TEU) or the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) that covers the repatriation of powers? If Cameron only wanted one power returned his only option is to invoke Article 50 of the TEU – leave the EU and negotiate a new ‘arrangement’.

If Cameron really does completely understand and in many ways share people’s concerns about Brussels getting too much power, then he has a damn odd way of showing it – and as for his ‘Lock’, it would appear Brussels has managed to ‘pick it’ on………. – how many directives have we had nodded through Parliament now since the locksmith installed said lock……?

Having told us that no way were we going to lend to the eurozone, lo and behold we are now informed Cameron has agreed to inject £1.3 billion from Britain into an EU-wide growth plan and the Prime Minister will give the go-ahead to the additional contribution to the European Investment Bank (EIB). In defense of this decision, no doubt we will be told that 3 million jobs depend on our membership of the EU and to safeguard those jobs, etc etc. And there was I thinking our country is ‘broke’ – in fact according to Eamonn Butler of the Adam Smith Institute, the UK’s national debt now stands at £1,055,000,000,000 – and he can’t be more precise than that because, he says, it’s increasing by about £4,000 a second.

Well, one thing is for sure – unlike the money found from Chloe Smith’s ‘underspend’ to enable the fuel price rise to be frozen, this £1.3 billion won’t be coming from any ‘underspend’ on the cost of MPs.

 

2012
06/26

Category:
David's Musings

TAG:



COMMENTS:
Comments Closed

The UK under Cameron must be a ‘shoe-in’

From Euobserver comes news that the member states on Monday (25 June) agreed to create a European endowment for democracy aimed to encourage “deep and sustainable” change in societies struggling under oppressive regimes.

It is to be noted that the endowment will be funded by member states and the European Commission – so yet more of taxpayer’s money will be spent on a project for which there was no mention in any political document of the Lib/Lab/Con and on which the agreement of the people of this country was not specifically sought. Not only that but note also the foreign ministers also agreed a global EU strategy on human rights and democracy and called for a new EU special representative on human rights, said representative who will no doubt require an office and staff.

The irony of the EU creating an endowment for democracy for societies struggling under oppressive regimes will not, I trust, have escaped the notice of readers.

 

Hosted By PDPS Internet Hosting

© Witterings from Witney 2012