Tag Archive: Bill Cash

We might as well not be here

On 16th of this month the European Select Committee quizzed three other Chairs of committees (Alan Beith, Keith Vaz, David Davies) on various matters EU (video here), including how to obtain advance information on European Legislation prior to it becoming law. The first question related to a statement by David Lidington that departmental select committees need to take more seriously their strategic responsibility in scrutiny of european matters.

Alan Beith was of the opinion that while the UK Representative at Brussels (UKREP) and his staff were helpful, they could do more in the area of advance notification of matters that are in the pipeline. On this point it was made known that Select Committees are deliberately excluded from advance notification on the basis that the Government and UKREP feel it would tie their hands in negotiations. Keith Vaz made the point that, When Europe Minister, he invariably only received notice of measures right at the last minute, while making the point that Select Committees had not done the amount of detailed examination within their own fields of responsibility on matters EU that was necessary.

Michael Connarty made the admission that as a Parliament, they had disengaged themselves from Europe under the last government, making the point that with enacting the Lisbon Treaty, power now lies with the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament and that the UK is “left out of it”. David Davies, in answer to the question whether there is anything better could be done to engage with “Europe”, replied that what was needed was an “Idiots Guide” explaining very simply how legislation is developed within the EU.

Chris Heaton-Harris queried whether better use of MEPs could be made, with Alan Beith responding it was farcical (my word) that MPs on committees and MEPs in Brussels were, at times, “moving in different directions”. Keith Vaz made the point that he spends more time liaising with his equivalent in France and Germany rather than his equivalent in the EU/Europe as he does not consider Europe to be a country.

On the matter of liaison between the European Scrutiny Committee (ESC) and other departmental committees, Bill Cash made it known that in the year 2011-2012 it had requested 11 “opinions” on matters affecting departmental committees and during 2012-2013 (so far) requested 2 “opinions”. Of the 11 requests, 2 were still outstanding and neither of the 2 requests for 2012-2013 had received a response. Also making the point that the ESC could hardly be accused of asking too many questions, he queried whether in fact they should be making more requests.

Michael Connarty raised the matter that all Select Committee Chairs receive a document called the “Brussels Bulletin” and that Clerks to Select Committee chairs should perhaps, as a matter of course, “scan” this bulletin and bring to the attention of their chairs matters which appear to be gaining traction within Brussels. Keith Vaz responded that his Clerk did do that but that he would in future include that document in his “required reading” each day.

Keith Vaz also pointed out that matters EU are not of interest to everyone and that they should be as, because of that disinterest, Parliament has become a kind of sideshow to what is happening elsewhere due to the fact that matters EU is not publicised sufficiently.

In a supplementary question Penny Mordaunt asked the three wise men appearing before the ESC whether they thought the new family-friendly hours of the House were one of the reasons for matters EU not being discussed, not only in the House, but also by Select Committees. Keith Vaz responded that he vote against the change as now there was little time for debate in either place and if proper debate is not possible he queried why MPs were there.

So we have now discovered that MPs admit they have not been as diligent as they should have been on matters EU; don’t really understand the legislative process of the EU and feel that an “Idiots Guide” would help; have no idea how – and/or from whom – information can be extracted from Brussels about matters EU; that Parliament has become a bit of a side-show; and that where the governance of this country is concerned, power now lies elsewhere.

Indeed, Mr. Vaz: why are MPs there?

H/T: Fausty

I wonder

Bill Cash has an article on Conservative Home and a letter in today’s Daily Telegraph, both of which appear to be a ‘Big-up Cameron’ piece and in both of which he makes the call for a return to Conservative principles and values and also points out that the Liberal Democrats are preventing Cameron repatriating powers from the European Union; the latter which is completely impossible for reasons explained many times on this blog and others.

Bearing in mind he is presented as the voice of Eurosceptism, might both article and letter be the precursor, when the “Old Bill” retires, to “Cash for Honours”?

Just asking………

 

The penny has dropped for one Conservative MP

With the news that the United Kingdom risks being fined by the European Court of Justice as the European Commission have judged that current rules, which disbar unemployed EU citizens from staying in the UK for more than three months unless they have their own health insurance, is a breach of the freedom of movement within the Union. The Commission issued a ‘reasoned opinion’ which can be read here.

Politics Home reports on this story with a link to a Daily Express article and quotes Douglas Carswell; he of renowned ‘eurosceptic’ fame, author of “The Plan”, the bête noir (or should that be bête bleu) of David Cameron:

“Another week, another outrage from Brussels. I thought we elected a government to run Britain but it seems we are governed by Europe.”

But it seems we are governed by Europe? But it seems? Er, Harwich, we have a problem…….

Not that Douglas Carswell is alone in not having realised exactly what membership of the European Union means where governance of this country is concerned. Bill Cash, the doyen of the ‘Eurosceptic’ Conservatives and never one to miss an opportunity to get his name in print, opines:

“We need to have a demonstration of what it is that we’ve been breaching. I don’t know the basis on which they’re doing this…….”

If Cash the Great doesn’t know what is happening, then heaven help David Cameron who currently doesn’t appear to know even what day of the week it is – let alone knowing how much it takes to set up a CCS plant.

Both Carswell and Cash campaigned during the 2010 General Election under the Conservative Party  ’Flag’ – and consequently on the Conservative Party Manifesto. On page 114 of that document it states:

“A Conservative government will negotiate for three specific guarantees – on the Charter of fundamental rights, on criminal justice, and on social and employment legislation – with our european [sic] partners to return powers that we believe should reside with the UK, not the EU. We seek a mandate to negotiate the return of these powers from the EU to the UK.”

It is now well known that repatriation of powers is not an achievable objective for reasons that I have explained previously. It cannot happen because if one power were returned by the European Union to one nation state it would result in a queue of Member States all requesting similar concessions and would result in the collapse of the ‘programme’.

Not long ago I accused David Cameron of mis-leading Parliament, following this post by Richard North. It is well known that mis-leading Parliament is a heinous crime, but is not misleading the electorate by a candidate, during an election, similarly a heinous crime – because that is what every Conservative candidate did who campaigned on that manifesto.

Just saying………………….

 

Hosted By PDPS Internet Hosting

© Witterings from Witney 2012